In Defense of Infowars

There is much speculation about Infowars being a “Zionist Operation”.

I am not certain how Infowars has responded to these allegations, but even if they did would their response be met with anything but icy cynicism?

Many declarations of evidence that Alex is a Zionist are ststements made out of context ot exaggerated.  If, for example one says anything positive about Isreal then it is obvious you are a shill.


Many view their attempts to avoid the topic being discussed openly as a cover-up.  And displays of proof, where the issue has been covered in some fashion are not only lacking, but are met with anger, rather than logical points.

The truth is, the Zionist issue is wrought with poison controversy.  Infowars is only exhibiting a keen sense of journalistic instinct when it comes to distancing themselves toward this heavy issue.

But wait!  No one asks what would happen if Alex Jones comes out tomorrow to admit he is shameless Zionist?

Seriously, would an honest debate about this issue finally happen without the juvenile name-calling and pandering nonsense?  Or would we just resort to thugs who only understand brute force, and conducting legislative matters at the point of a gun?

It is very dangerous to wander in the territory of baseless accusations and slander.

Alex Jones, if he decided to hypothetically out himself as a Zionist would be hated because of demonization campaigns, a general ignorance of the issue at hand, and NOT based on the content of his character.

Rightly so, Alex Jones wants to avoid the type of controversy that some radical Zionist types could possibly attract-from both sides.  He would be a ripe target for assassination-more than he is now.

This is a complex issue.  It is multi-faceted.  Conspiracy-minded folks will read into it too much.  They think because Infowars does not concern themselves with that issue, then there must be a secret agenda.  The reality is that the issue itself is very difficult to discuss without pissing several people off immediately.  It is not a topic raised in mainstream media culture; when it is brought up on alternative media platforms there is a wide range of views on this topic and since there is a lack of consensus on basic things like terminology-it is easy to make accusations based solely on semantical phenomena.



We Are Anti Authoritarians!

This post is in reaponse to the recent wave of political riots in the United States.

Do not confuse this blog with the liberal, wind-up toys of the “alt-right”. Alt right is a deep state term-it is meant to demonize liberty enthusiasts by putting forward idiotic neo nazi groups to represent it.  “Alt right” is meaningless.  It cannot be defined.

This blog asserts that some associated with the “alt right” and groups like antifa are both competing factions within the leftist political spectrum.

This blog predicts it will be revealed with time that the alt right groups are, along with antifa, government controlled opposition agents.

Just ask yourself why it is okay for leftists to tote guns and they are seen as “defending freedom” but when constitutionalists do it, it is considered racist?

This blog decries any attempt to supress personal freedom.  And it will expose the technocrat’s goal to destabilize various regions with paid actors posing as protestors, and “alt right” groups that attempt to discredit true constitutional groups.

Don’t forget: The biggest minority is the individual.

Alternative Media Designated as “Fake” by Leftist Authoritarian

control and nation

A liberal professor, Melissa Zimdar created a list of “fake news” sites which are argued to have affected the 2016 presidential election.  It appears to be a list of conservative sites, like Breitbart, that do not fit into the corporate-controlled media narrative.

This action is an indication of a totalitarian regime attempting to assert power over the public, and the same standards of what constitutes as “fake” can also be applied to the New York Times or the Washington Post.

Combined with their efforts to classify certain media as “fake”, they have also attempted to demonize their alternative competitors by  portraying “alt-right” media as affiliated with Neo-Nazis.

Many liberty media outlets have been lumped into this category of “alt-right” and it has become an all encompassing term for racist white bigots by the corporate-controlled press.


Let it be stated that Neo-Nazis are more similar to the corporate-controlled media run by the Clinton Crime Machine, in affiliation with the Democrat gangsters than any “alt-right” organization.



Election 2016 (a rant)

The politics in america can be summed up like this: Corporate fascist vs. Authoritarian Nazi.

Are you kidding me?  You all are still going to subscribe to this absurd system?  You have a choice, believe it or not.  But no, you will remain passive, and dismissive of every horrible new development in the news!

Hillary and Trump?  Really?  Is that the best they can do?  And what will you people do?  You just accept it.  Look up Jill Stein and Gary Johnson if you have half a brain left.  Trump is the symptom of an illness that will not be cured by voting for Hillary, and a vote for Hillary is just submission to the corporatism put in place during the previous administrations.

Settling for Trump because he is the supposed alternative to Hillary is intellectual laziness and a sign that any “liberty” movement has been infiltrated by feds.  You know why?  Because a lot of the Libertarian media have already voiced support for Trump, but he is not a genuine Libertarian–he is a Nationalist(which is not a bad thing, by the way, but call it like it is, for God’s sake).  This is intellectual laziness because the two ideologies cannot continue to be confused–it is the corporate fascist media who continues to lump Nationalists in with Libertarians and the KKK and supposed “Right-wing” hate groups(when the meaning of “Right-wing” has been so distorted that the term cannot even be used in its proper context–the political terminology has been morphed and twisted, the term “Liberal” for example has been posited as the alternate to “Conservative” but these words have been shifted so much that they are meaningless, and are simply used for selective situations for the convenience of the parties involved).

The people are craving anything that seems like it will hurt the established order, and so Trump seems appealing.  Many of his policies seem suspect but the people are so fed up with the form administration doing everything it could/can to destroy individual liberty that they will settle for anything.

The lack of support or investigation into the third-party candidates is indicative of a controlled mainstream media and the public’s refusal for coverage of those candidates either means they are falling for the left/right paradigm again because their memories are so horrible that they have already forgotten both Bushes, the Clinton years, and the Obama travesties and they are succumbing to the illusion of choice again.

The people cannot afford to be so ignorant and apathetic in this system.  Democrats are willing to just let the party officials steal the nomination for Bernie Sanders?  What the hell?  And even though Sanders and Clinton have different perspectives on Liberalism, the Democrats will still settle for Clinton!  Bernie may be a socialist, but at least he stood up to the central bankers in Senate hearings, and he supported legislation to audit the fed.  What has Clinton done to stand up to the central bankers?  She is in bed with the central bankers–the central bankers are funding her, but the people will accept her as Bernie’s replacement in the “Liberal” spectrum in American politics–the media has no concept of true Liberalism so the concept is completely absurd to anyone who analyzes politics.

And Cruz is your alternative to Trump?  Really?   A globalist new world order operative who has orchestrated a patriot persona in order to get the Conservatives to blindly accept the same technocratic policies put in place by Dictator Obama?  That is your alternative to Trump?  That is a grotesque proposal to say the least.

The alternative media has not done its due diligence in the matter of covering the 2016 election because it continues to prop up the illusory two party system as all their is and all there ever will be.  RT and CNN give Johnson and Stein a little bit of coverage, but in the end those two candidates cannot realistically compete with the non-stop obsession over the next controversial Trump comment and the next Clinton scandal–people don’t understand that any coverage is good coverage and the more controversial these people are the better.  The only thing Stein and Johnson did wrong was not being involved in some illicit behavior that would capture the media’s attention and stimulate the public’s imagination, feeding the public’s appetite for more depraved politicians to obsess over.

Liberty Movement ALREADY Infiltrated




The liberty movement is already being crippled with disinformation that is being spread via the alternative press, or “nu media.”

The rise of nu media is not inherently bad, it is the necessary step forward in the fight against tyranny. And the pathetic attempt to infiltrate it is the consequence of its success.   

The nu media is the future, because it empowers the public, and for this reason it is a threat.

Progressive movements are the most vulnerable to some cancerous disinfo agent’s malignant infection, because they inspire the imagination.

It is not that other partisan types like Republicans and Democrats don’t have imagination, but they resist too much change, hence they are easily controlled by corporate interests.

The liberals and progressives(and I am speaking about genuine liberals and progressives–not fascist authoritarians!), want to expand freedom, fight oppression, and ultimately empower everyone.

The authoritarian neo-feudal control freaks cannot have these grass-roots campaigns springing up without their control.

There are many signs that the fascists have infiltrated the liberty movement.

What is the “liberty movement”?  It is not a single entity, but a phenomenon taking shape around the world.

The “Liberty Movement” is a response to the emerging technotronic era that threatens individual liberty by transferring control of the state from the public to a small group of supposed “experts.”

People are becoming more politically aware, because of the Liberty Movement’s influence manifesting through the nu media, and simultaneously some are exhibiting dangerous signs of naivety, and this is a result of the technocrat’s crafty manipulation of the public.

One striking example is the hi-jacking of Ayn Rand’s message from her popular novel, Atlas Shrugged.   The core message of the novel is a warning against fascism seizing control of a government through measures of “altruistic” regulations for the greater good.   The result of these benevolent egalitarian laws is brutal oppression.

brute rand.jpg

A lot of disinformation has been spread about this novel.  Disinfo operatives claim it is a secret plan for the illuminati, a step-by-step playbook for the elites to construct a technocracy, or neo-feudal atmosphere.

This phenomenon of deliberately skewing the message of Altas Shrugged from a idealist story of individual liberty to a cipher of technocratic tyranny, an elitist manual for the New World Order is the authoritarian’s dream of inverted reality as posited in Orwell’s 1984.

This is a textbook example of cognitive dissonance–people can read the book, or see the movie Atlas Shrugged for themselves, to interpret the message of individual liberty, while believing the contrary, bogus disinformation that, instead of promoting classical liberal values, it is a technocratic illuminati plan for depopulation and the like.

left right monkey

Any argument for individual rights is compromised by the fact that one of the most prominent libertarian philosophers is discredited by this disastrous meme.

The debate for individual rights is soiled by the propaganda of the authoritarians appealing to the nature of libertarians fundamentally opposed to totalitarianism; this ruse is the means to pave a way for the justification of collectivism through various disinfo campaigns. 

The conditioned response to anything like Atlas Shrugged on the part of the libertarians will then be a knee-jerk reaction of vehement opposition against libertarian ideas, even if those ideas are obvious reflections of the ones they are attempting to articulate.

Any appeal to logic will be ignored with a sense of self-entitled obstinate rage, because long ago a disinfo agent planted the seed that: “Ayn Rand is a technocrat operative.”

So, therefore the conclusion will be taken for granted that the individual is NOT the biggest minority, but a simple philosophical abstraction, an illusion that has been constructed by a “patriarchal society.”

control and nation.jpg

This is how the authoritarians manipulate the minds of the public by changing what the argument is about rather than continually losing the debate on individual rights verses collectivism.


The individual vs. the goo

The individual is the largest minority. The State is a neurotic control freak.

Jon Rappoport's Blog

The individual vs. the goo

by Jon Rappoport

December 31, 2014


“The people” is a convenient term for “every INDIVIDUAL.”

This has been lost in translation. It has been garbled, distorted, just as the proprietor of an old-fashioned carnival shell game distorts the audience’s perception with sleight of hand.

Are “the people” one group? Well, that’s the ultimate Globalist formulation.

However, from the point of view of the free individual, things are upside down. It is HIS power that is primary, not the monolithic corporate State’s.

From his point of view, what does the social landscape look like?


I’m not talking about organizations that are actually streamlined to produce something of value. I’m talking about organizations that PLAN MORE ORGANIZATION OF LIFE.

If you want to spend a disturbing afternoon, read through (and try to fathom) the bewildering blizzard of sub-organizations…

View original post 1,731 more words

Rand Paul: Formidable Populist or Neo Con Sellout?


It seems Rand Paul will run for President in 2016.  He has charmed all the factions of the Republican party, but ultimately might sell out his libertarian base with his shameless support of the TPP and failure to demonstrate any intentions of halting the United States’ insatiable appetite for ravenous imperialism.

Rand Paul seems to be indulging in the same mainstream fantasies about terrorism when he fails to recognize the reality of government-manufactured groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda.

Libertarians won’t address this issue because Rand Paul is their hope for real change, but it is important to remember that Rand Paul is NOT Ron Paul and the system will change Rand Paul before he changes it.

Will the change that Washington needs be sacrificed for another political fad, or will the public wake up and demand serious solutions?