The implications of such a pervasive false narrative, like the recent subject of Ukraine’s instability and the supposed question of Crimea’s independence exhorted by the corporate-controlled mass media, are heavy.
This situation can be used to effectively illustrate how the media is a state-run instrument of the technocratic elite whose main goal is the elimination of national sovereignty, not only here, but abroad as well. It is no longer accurate to merely state that the US foreign policies are corrupt, because not only does the issue run much deeper, but more specifically it is the corporate trans-nationalists’ interests at play in this episode playing out in Ukraine, and other situations like it—this is the most current example.
In a recent Foreign Affairs article by Alexander J Motyl entitled: “Is Putin Rational?” Motyl paints Putin as a raving lunatic bent on an extreme eastern version of the west’s manifest destiny, a ravenous opportunist who craves to use this moment of instability for his own nefarious ends.
“Russia’s state-controlled channels whip up anti-Ukrainian hysteria as Putin and the Kremlin insist that the government in Kiev illegitimate. No one can fully know Putin’s intentions. One’s best guess depends on one’s assumptions of his rationality. If he is irrational — unable to correctly judge the costs and benefits of invading Ukraine because he is in thrall to some ideology or the pursuit of power — then it is safe to assume that he will continue on his current course. Lilia Shevtsova, a liberal Russian analyst, and Andrei Illarionov, Putin’s former economic advisor, make that case. “He believes that he is chosen by divine providence to punish liberated Ukrainians,” Illarianov writes, “He believes that now there is a unique historical situation: Ukraine is in [a] state of severe crises, its authorities and institutions do not function effectively. He dreams that providence demands him to fulfill this mission.” If Illarionov and Shevtsova are right, nothing can stop Putin from launching a massive land war against Ukraine, regardless of how much it would cost in human life, property, and prestige. Such a Putin could conceivably keep marching up to the Atlantic, , a Russian political scientist and Putin’s ideological mentor, believes Russia must. “If we win,” he recently wrote, “we will begin the expansion of liberational (from Americans) ideology into Europe. It is the goal of full Eurasianism — Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok. Great Eurasian Continental Empire.”
These commentators neglect to mention that the aggression was initiated by the west, and the fact that a coup has been orchestrated by the technocrats, and that the new government, the Svoboda party is a group of Neo Nazis.
The real question is: is John Kerry rational? What about Barrack Obama? Are these people sane?
These are not questions in jest, there needs to be a serious look into the mental health of the supposed United States’ leaders first. The President and Secretary of State really seem hell bent on starting a war. It doesn’t help the situation to have Neo Con lunatics like John McCain and Lindsey graham to provoke them.
This is just another case of a democratically elected government watching out for its own people’s interests which happen to conflict with technocratic elites who would love to issue a humungous loan to the country under the guise of economic aid, the repayment of the loan subject to strict austerity measure that are imposed on the people, and the country’s assets are simultaneously stolen as collateral and a down payment for the loan. This corporate, trans-nationalist loan shark policy, an attempt to maintain control over various governments, follows a long tradition of throwing out democratically elected governments, e.g., Iran, Chile, Venezuela, Panama, Guatemala, just to name a few, installing dictators, and reaping the financial benefits of profits from renewed infrastructure, and the utilization of specific country’s various assets.
It all started when Ukraine parliament rejected the EU deal, and all hell broke loose.
The Ukraine president, Yanukovich stated:
“[Softening the economic blow] requires our joint work on a program of economic aid to Ukraine, which will allow us to implement the preparation for the signing of the agreement. We believe such a program should be the result of a joint effort by Ukraine and the EU,” Protestors hit streets.
Nulland claimed a Ukrainian government wouldn’t be stable unless they support the EU, she mentioned that she had been working with prominent businessmen and lobbyists who had an interest in changing the geopolitical environment, and she admitted to spending five billion on Ukraine’s needs, and ‘other goals’.
During the riots there were sightings of military clad operatives being unloaded from buses, this scene was reminiscent of the Bolsheviks in Czarist 1917 Russia, Wall Street financed rebels with a mission to overthrow the government, staging ‘a people’s uprising, communist revolution’, these right-wing nationalists , coming en masse to provoke violence.
The Ukrainian president, Yanukovych observed:
“The towns are patrolled by masked men with armbands. They fire top army officers – those who show resistance and do not want to use armed forces in the south-east of the country against the civilian population. Just think about it – they want to put the army under the banner of Bandera and launch a civil war,”
Yanukovych further lamented the destruction of his country:
“dark forces in Kiev want to have armed forces of militant nationalist organizations involved, they want to give them weapons.”
There was a leaked call where Victoria Nulland Assistant Secretary of State, was heard planning a meeting with ‘Yats’ to offer government position because of his ’economic experience’.
Pyatt: Yeah. I guess… in terms of him not going into the government, just let him stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I’m just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead we want to keep the moderate democrats together. The problem is going to be Tyahnybok [Oleh Tyahnybok, the other opposition leader] and his guys and I’m sure that’s part of what [President Viktor] Yanukovych is calculating on all this.
Nuland: [Breaks in] I think Yats is the guy who’s got the economic experience, the governing experience. He’s the… what he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside. He needs to be talking to them four times a week, you know. I just think Klitsch going in… he’s going to be at that level working for Yatseniuk, it’s just not going to work.
Pyatt: Yeah, no, I think that’s right. OK. Good. Do you want us to set up a call with him as the next step?
Nuland: My understanding from that call – but you tell me – was that the big three were going into their own meeting and that Yats was going to offer in that context a… three-plus-one conversation or three-plus-two with you. Is that not how you understood it?
Pyatt: No. I think… I mean that’s what he proposed but I think, just knowing the dynamic that’s been with them where Klitschko has been the top dog, he’s going to take a while to show up for whatever meeting they’ve got and he’s probably talking to his guys at this point, so I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the three and it gives you also a chance to move fast on all this stuff and put us behind it before they all sit down and he explains why he doesn’t like it.
Nuland: OK, good. I’m happy. Why don’t you reach out to him and see if he wants to talk before or after.
Pyatt: OK, will do. Thanks.
After the western media relentlessly drove the people into hysterics over a supposed ‘invasion in Crimea’ the Russians announced they were holding military exercises in Crimea to secure military assets, in the wake of the recent western coup.
Despite the citizens of Crimea area pledging allegiances to Russia, a vote of 97% to join Russia, the US threatened sanctions against Russia unless they leave. The US, or more accurately stated, predatory corporate interests claimed repeatedly with a nauseating general sense of lunatic obstinance that Russia was violating Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Putin, at of expense of being labeled ‘irrational’, and even compared to Hitler by Hilary Clinton, says that the new Ukraine government is illegitimate, that it was hijacked by ‘Ultra-Nationalists’.
The US proceeded to impose sanctions against Russia, it also created a law reserving the right to seize assets of anyone who ‘disrupts Ukraine’s sovereignty’.
This is another manifestation of the technocratic control-freak agenda playing out yet again.
Installing a Neo-Nazi government in an unstable region is arsenic icing for a cake that already exists through the looking glass, which happens to be laced with some supernatural hybrid of PCP and LSD, and this summation is an understatement.
Putin was able to produce an effective diplomatic solution last year with the looming threat of a virtual nuclear proxy war situation in Syria.
But who in this situation will save the people at the perpetual mercy of raving lunatics at the helm?